Matthew
24 is difficult: both difficult to interpret, and difficult to ignore.
Although some details puzzle me (and I welcome your feedback), I am
convinced that many people greatly abuse the clear parts. How can
futurists justifiably push it all into our future? How can full
preterists justifiably push it all into our past?
Jesus
is talking about two totally separate events. Consider the contrasts He
provides. Regarding the destruction of Jerusalem, Jesus foretold a
clear sign of impending doom. As for the end of heaven and earth, Jesus
said nobody knows when it will be.
The sign of Jerusalem's end was "the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel," to which the Holy Spirit
adds, "(whoever reads, let him understand)" (Matthew 24:15). Luke
offers the understanding: "When you shall see Jerusalem compassed with
armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them
which are in Judea flee" (21:20,21). Escape was offered.
In
sharp contrast, Jesus said: "Heaven and earth shall pass away... but of
that day and hour knows no man" (Matthew 24:35,36). I believe that both
preterists and futurists empty these words of meaning. Preterists say
the general time of Jerusalem's destruction was known, but not the exact
day. Futurists say we know roughly when Jesus will return; we just
don't know the exact day. They both miss how Jesus was contrasting two
events.
Jesus
gave them a precise sign so they would know exactly when to run for
their lives to escape Jerusalem's doom. In contrast, no warning sign
will be given of Jesus' return. "In such an hour as you think not the
Son of man comes" (Matthew 24:44). From Matthew 24:35 thru 25:13, Jesus'
theme is that we must always be ready because there is no way to know
when He will return. No sign will allow unbelievers to quickly repent
and escape doom.
No one knows when Jesus will return, either roughly or precisely
No comments:
Post a Comment